Small Businesses Are Those Left Behind

 

 Small Businesses Are Those Left Behind


The world has fought its battle against the corona-virus pandemic for 11 months now. Huge expansions of central banks balance sheets, zero/negative interest rate policies and government spending programs were implemented to dampen the economic damages that government imposed lockdowns and social distancing measures caused. 

As a result of the low interest rates environment companies have loaded up on huge amounts of debt in 2020. Since 1995 the median debt to assets of US restaurants have fluctuated somewhere around 15 and 35 percent. According to a Crescat Capital Chart in July it has skyrocketed to around 70% this year:


Additionally, restaurants suffer from an implosion of revenues because of government imposed lockdowns and restrictions on the one hand and on the other hand because of people cutting back on restaurant visits. Those additional loans were made possible because of government guarantees - instead of the bank who makes the loan the risk is now transferred to the government. 

But even with these measures in play, banks are cautious to lend money to smaller businesses as their business model will like stay at risk throughout the following year. As bigger companies have easier access to credit, SMEs fall behind:


Another problem is that the government programs that initially were created to support small and medium enterprises totally missed its goal. More than a quarter of the Fed's PPP (Pandemic Purchase Program) money went to only one percent of the recipients. The top 5 percent received more than half of all loan value:  

All optimism during the summer where covid-cases have been much lower has been washed away by reimposed lockdowns and restrictions. The recent numbers of small business employment clearly shows this.  

Everytime when the central banks and governments offer free money, everyone who qualifies for receiving it will apply for it even though if they do not need it. As soon as the stimulus package was introduced, hedge funds and other trading firms realized that they may be able to participate: 

 Because of all those things more and more businesses have got skeptical about the future. According to a survey 40 percent of small business owners did not think that their businesses would survive which is about 8 percentage points higher than it was in April. 

Even though the situation changed since then we are still far away from returning to normality and the new mutated version of Covid has not changed the situation  for the better. Additionally liquidity injections do not solve the problems that businesses are facing and therefore only create the illusion of security. 

In Europe the situation is not any better as many companies struggle to adapt to the new normality: Nearly all European countries have implemented the german "Kurzarbeit"-model where workers cut back on hours worked and governments subsidize a huge part of the wage paid. While this undoubtedly helps to keep workers from being laid off the longer the program is implemented it hinders structual change. 

There will be a point in time when this crisis ends and all the fiscal aid to businesses will be cut off but businesses will have to bear much more debt which they have to deal with. The will have to cut costs to be able to pay it back and the first thing they will do is that they will lay off workers. If demand remains weaker than before even that is not enough and many of them will have to go out of business. 

If this tsunami of bankruptcies is unleashed, the real problems will begin...


Disclaimer: This is a personal blog. Any views or opinions represented in this blog are personal and belong solely to the blog owner and do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Beginning of The Great Stagflation?

Image
It was the year of 1958, when British economist and statistician Alban William Housegeo Phillips  published a paper in Economica , named The Relation Between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861 - 1957 . Phillips observed that the data shows a relationship between unemployment and money wage growth. The data showed that wage growth was low whenever unemployment was high and vice versa.  Phillips, however, was not the first one how observed this. You can already find similar findings in the writings of David Hume in 1752, or 30 years prior to Phillips in an essay from Irving Fisher in 1926. Nevertheless, Phillips did not argue that higher wage growth rates will lead to lower unemployment, but Phillips argued that there is a stable relationship because in times of a tight labor market, it would be easy for workers to bargain for higher wages.  It was Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow, who developed Phillips model further and repl...
Read more

The ECBs Dilemma

Image
This week I want to talk more about central bank policy and its consequences, especially the ECB and a possible dilemma on the horizon. Whenever ECB members talk about NIRP , they point out that the primary goal of negative interest rates and quantitative easing is to keep financial conditions favorable for the economic recovery , so commercial banks create loans to businesses to create real economic growth. However, it seems that econometric models of central bankers ( not only the ECBs models ) overlook the fact that low-interest rate policies and bond buying programs do not only influence the slope of the yield curve but the structure of the real economy as well. Such policies distort the production process of an economy because it leads to the reallocation of capital. For example, capital X is invested in A instead of B, which distorts the whole supply and demand system. I want to start today's text with a short summary of ECB bond buying programs since 2009 and talk a little b...
Read more

This Time Is Really Different

Image
This week I want to write about three topics which caught my attention since last Friday. Firstly, there was the really, really bad jobs-report from Friday. Secondly, Christian Broda and Stanley Druckenmiller have published a commentary in the Wall Street Journal, stating that the Fed is playing with fire  and thirdly, big inflation numbers from this Wednesday.  The US Jobs Report Expectations have been high last Friday: Economists expected very good job numbers because of the tail wind from the grand reopening  and that people are returning to normal life. Consensus estimated 1 million additional jobs, Aneta Markowska from Jeffries even estimated 2.1 million jobs. In the end, the US economy added 266 thousand jobs in April, Markowska has roughly miscalculated by a factor of TEN. Instead of an unemployment rate of 5.8 %, unemployment still stayed above the 6 % level (officially). The labor force has grown by 430,000 in April, with 102,000 looking for work and 328,000 wit...
Read more